Table of Contents
Assessment Questions
AC 1.1 Explain the principles of reward and its importance to organisational culture and performance management.
Principles
Organisations must establish reward structures as crucial elements to recruit, maintain, and drive employee performance. Reward follows these vital principles:
Fairness
Employees must view their pay and benefits as fair since they relate directly to their work responsibilities and achievements. The company should set rewards at levels that adhere to external market norms and internal job progression scheme criteria (Caroline, 2024). Eco-Insulate UK’s lack of incentive programs may create employee dissatisfaction with unfair compensation, harming employee spirit and work drive.
Equity
Compensation systems should evaluate skill set diversity, personnel experience level, and achievement results. Employee compensation should be equal for the employees performing similar roles (Novakovic, 2025). Implementing pension programs for high-ranking employees generates an organisational split that results in dissatisfaction expressed by regular staff.
Transparency
Employees need to know all elements of the reward process, from salary structures to performance-based incentives to their benefit. When reward systems remain unclear, employees will develop mistrust and disengagement (SCIO, 2024). Limited transparency in Eco-Insulate UK’s reward structure prevents employees from understanding the relationship between their work output and possible compensation benefits, so the organisation may lose valuable personnel.
Link to Organisational Culture
Company culture develops through reward systems because they mould how employees think and conduct their work. A fair and transparent reward system fosters a culture of trust and engagement. Eco-Insulate UK’s current negative workplace culture develops because employees fail to feel appreciated through incentive programs. Company rewards that include recognition programs and profit-sharing initiatives would enhance employee motivation, thus strengthening organisational commitment and developing a positive workplace culture (CIPD, 2024).
Link to Performance Management
A properly thought-out incentive program supports performance management by promoting desired work conduct. A direct connection between employee performance and incentives motivates workers to be more productive and motivated (CIPD, 2024). Performance-based incentives such as skill-based pay and bonuses at Eco-Insulate UK will enhance operational efficiency by rewarding employee achievements, thus lowering employee turnover (CIPD, 2024).
AC 1.2 Assess the contribution of extrinsic and intrinsic rewards to improving employee contribution and sustained organisational performance.
Workers’ motivation depends on external and internal factors, vital in organisational performance sustenance and individual contribution.
Extrinsic Rewards
Extrinsic rewards are tangible remunerations that companies provide to their staff (). Staff receive extrinsic rewards, including salary, bonuses, benefits, and promotions from external sources (Rice, 2021). External rewards help workers deliver work tasks proficiently while reaching agreed organisation targets.
Advantages and disadvantages
Extrinsic rewards through performance-based bonuses trigger workplace efficiency because they directly stimulate employees to fulfil their targets effectively (AIHR, 2024). Introducing an incentive program for Eco-Insulate UK would improve employee productivity and decrease staff turnover.
Nevertheless, staff members who take short-term motivational approaches aim to collect prizes without caring for either career advancement or business objectives. When workers depend heavily on financial rewards, they lose their internal drive, so their commitment diminishes after reward periods end (Kowalska, 2023).
Intrinsic Rewards
Intrinsic rewards are intangible remunerations companies give employees for exemplary performance (Anees, 2023). They stem from three key areas: autonomy at work, career growth opportunities and feedback from colleagues who value their work. Workers obtain motivation through the satisfaction they experience at work and its meaningfulness to their daily operations (Anees, 2023).
Advantages and Disadvantages of Intrinsic Rewards
Workers who discover meaning in their tasks become more dedicated because they are more satisfied with their jobs (AIHR, 2024). When Eco-Insulate UK implements recognition systems coupled with growth opportunities, the organisation will create an environment with positive effects.
Nevertheless, measuring intrinsic motivation proves difficult for organisations because each person responds differently to non-financial appreciation and maintains challenges in implementation (Empuls, 2025). The personnel at Eco-Insulate UK face challenges in developing impactful non-financial reward structures.
Impact on improving employee contribution and organisational performance
Intrinsic Rewards
The key intrinsic motivators of recognition, meaningful work, and personal growth lead workers to feel high commitment and involvement. Employees demonstrate higher commitment rates, creative performance, and productivity when their work satisfies personal values and workplace expectations (Ibitomi et al., 2022). Empowering workers to take control while allowing them to achieve mastery and create purpose in their work increases job satisfaction, thus raising employee retention levels and building up organisational culture. Valued and empowered employees demonstrate higher workplace contribution, which advances organisational execution and promotes innovativeness (Manzoor, Wei and Asif, 2021).
Extrinsic Rewards
External workplace rewards such as pay hikes, performance bonuses and wellness programs effectively motivate behaviours that organisations wish to see from their employees. Excellently paid employees remain in their positions, and successful performance awards boost working results through target completions (Active, 2025). Employee recognition programs that award monthly employee and long-term service excellence help increase workplace morale and foster positive workplace cultures. When companies depend excessively on external reward systems to motivate employees, this practice might reduce natural workplace enthusiasm without proper balance (Empuls, 2025). Extrinsic rewards implemented in an organised manner cause employees to direct their efforts toward organisational targets, enhancing operational effectiveness and performance outcomes.
AC 2.1 Explain the differences between types of grade and pay structures.
Organisations apply different grade systems and pay scales to establish employee payment methods. The employment structures determine how workers progress up the career ladder while controlling their work motivation and creating fair organisational practices. The structures could be formal or informal. The main formal pay structures and their differences are as follows;
Multi-Graded Pay Structure
Employment at multiple salary grades includes organised pay bands. Job complexity, responsibility, and employee skills determine each worker’s placement level. Academic advancement between grades happens due to promotions, lengthy service or successful job execution (Morris, 2025).
Advantages and Disadvantages of Multi-Graded Structures
A defined career development plan through multi-graded structures enables staff to advance their pay and position while driving their professional drive and workplace commitment (Morris, 2025). Defining specific salary ranges ensures the organisation maintains fair pay distribution among all staff members (Morris, 2025).
Nevertheless, the demotivation of employees often arises when they reach their maximum grade level because they have no path to advancement beyond a promotion (Schurk, 2023). In addition, the management process involving various grades requires significant time from administrators. They must frequently assess their position compared to other organisations.
Broad-Banded Pay Structure
Based on broad-banding, employees can find their pay spread across fewer wide-ranging bands, which unite several small pay grades. Under a broad-banded structure, employees can shift their salaries between broader available pay limits (Emma& Emma, 2023). The organisational style applies particularly well to flexible organisations requiring dynamic operations.
Advantages of Broad-Banded Structures
Wealthier organisations can adjust performance-based compensation, market trend-driven changes, and skill-based wage modifications. Also, the system allows employees to advance through different band positions without needing promotion steps, thus supporting their skill development (Emma& Emma, 2023).
However, improper management of broad salary bands introduces the risk of unbalanced compensation levels between staff performing equivalent work roles (The Human Capital Hub, 2023). Moreover, workers experience difficulties in following their career paths because band moves do not automatically lead to new titles and specific achievement markers (The Human Capital Hub, 2023).
AC 2.2 Explain how contingent rewards can impact individual, team and organisational performance
Pay or benefits under contingent rewards are directly linked to how employees perform their duties. Organisations achieve employee motivation and improvements through these rewards, creating alignment between team and individual objectives. Organisational Eco-Insulate UK suffers from low reward schemes and high employee turnover, so implementing contingent rewards would develop a positive work environment and advance performance levels. The following section is a demonstration of how rewards that are contingent on performance results affect performance output at different organisational levels.
Performance-Related Pay (PRP)
Independent performance evaluation results in financial bonuses or salary increases, one of the most popular types of contingent employee pay. Stakeholders offer performance-based monetary incentives which relate directly to established organisational metrics, including targets, sales numbers, and achievement goals (Cotton, 2022)
Impact on Individual Performance:
The direct incentive element of PRP enables individuals to obtain better results than their performance targets required (Cotton, 2022). Eco-Insulate UK employees might raise their performance and show better workplace engagement because of this employee motivation system. In addition, the connection of pay to performance allows individuals to sense they govern their income growth, which drives them to better their abilities and meet their objectives (Cotton, 2022).
Impact on Team Performance
The involvement of teams with performance metrics under PRP provokes members to work together (Bonifacio, 2024). Teams at Eco-Insulate UK could unite to achieve their production objectives, enhancing collective work and team cooperation.
However, PRP encourages harmful team competition when poor management occurs, thus destroying team unity (Bonifacio, 2024). Implementing PRP in Eco-Insulate UK may cause opposition among staff members who feel that other team members receive undeserved payment.
Impact on Organisational Performance
PRP helps organisations boost performance output by establishing employee goals that support strategic company objectives, resulting in better achievement of organisational targets. PRP implementation at Eco-Insulate UK would enhance production outcomes, make operations more efficient, and minimise employee departures (Aithor, 2024).
An adequately designed PRP system allows Eco-Insulate UK to become more desirable as an employer for workers who seek direct reward relationships based on their contributions to the organisation.
Skill-Based Pay SBP
Workplace Compensation based on Skills allows employees to get paid for mastering additional competencies that boost their workplace abilities (Serrador, 2025). Pay increases at Eco-Insulate UK depend on an employee successfully mastering particular skills and competencies.
Individual Performance
Under SBP, employees develop new skills through encouragement, which results in better job performance at Eco-Insulate UK. This approach at Eco-Insulate UK would enable workers to progress towards more challenging responsibilities and display increased productivity levels (Rataj, 2023). Better employee satisfaction and decreased employee turnover occur when Eco-Insulate UK provides recognition and rewards for employee skill advancements (Rataj, 2023).
Team Performance
When members develop new competencies, the team gains improved abilities, which enhances their overall capability (Joseph, 2025). The employees of Eco-Insulate UK work better collectively to reach team objectives because they possess an extended range of abilities.
SBP motivates its employees to share skills obtained with their colleagues to develop a learning environment throughout their teams (Joseph, 2025). The manufacturing requirements at Eco-Insulate UK stand to gain from this approach due to its importance for quality production and operational efficiency.
Organisational Performance
The company experiences better efficiency and innovative advancements because employees learn new skills (Serrador, 2025). Using skilled employees for innovation would enable Eco-Insulate UK to maintain a competitive position within the eco-friendly insulation market.
Besides, the organisation’s steady growth depends on SBP because it always promotes employee development (Serrador, 2025). Employee development investments by Eco-Insulate UK will produce sustainable organisational growth and operational capabilities.
AC 2.3 Explain the merits of different types of benefits offered by organisations.
Merits of Different Types of Benefits
Paid-Leave Benefits
Staff get the chance to rest during 28 days of annual leave provided by Eco-Insulate UK as part of their paid-leave benefits, which help employees achieve work-life balance and improved well-being. The system helps employees avoid burnout, which in turn reduces time off work and enhances long-term organisational output. Employees who get enough rest periods demonstrate improved engagement at work, along with increased motivation, which creates better workplace performance (Schooley, 2023).
Besides, organisations that offer paid leave to employees prove their dedication to staff welfare, which leads to better employee retention and job satisfaction. Enhancing leave policy at Eco-Insulate UK with new types of personal or family-related leave would boost the company’s appeal to staff, keeping them in their positions and thus improving employee retention rates (Schooley, 2023).
Health and Well-Being Benefits
Organisations that provide private health insurance, as well as mental health support and wellness programs, create healthier teams that operate with increased productivity. Workers who access healthcare and wellness programs at work stay healthy and active. Thus, they miss fewer days from work and deliver high productivity levels (CIPD, 2023). At Eco-Insulate UK, the implementation of such benefits would strengthen employee satisfaction while cutting down on long-term sickness absences.
In addition, reliable job markets recognise companies that focus on employee health because this practice builds supportive workplace environments with engaged personnel and stable employer branding (Suff, 2024). The inclusion of health-related benefits will help Eco-Insulate UK obtain a better organisational culture.
AC 2.4 Explain the merits of different types of recognition schemes offered by organisations.
A company’s success depends on organised employee recognition systems that boost staff morale while creating happy employees and forming a harmonious workplace environment. Employers offer official or spontaneous recognition, including financial incentives, awards, and non-financial rewards. Two standard employee recognition systems exist with specific advantages that follow.
Public Recognition
Public recognition occurs when organisations publicly show appreciation to their employees in the presence of their coworkers (Kinne, 2022). The organisation should use company meetings and award ceremonies and publish in newsletters and through social media platforms for employee recognition (Kinne, 2022).
Example (Eco-Insulate UK)
Eco-Insulate UK maintains an unfavourable workplace environment and has excessive personnel departures. Establishing an “Employee of the Month” program would create better employee morale at the workplace. Benchmarking extraordinary employee performance in company newsletters and group meetings drives employee motivation towards decreased staff turnover (Empuls, 2025).
Importance, risks and challenges
Public acknowledgement of workers motivates them and enhances their dedication to achieving organisational targets (Wickham, 2023). Besides, recognition strengthens workplace culture by creating an environment that promotes gratefulness and inspires staff members to achieve greater excellence.
Risks
However, some employees could experience embarrassment and discomfort because public acknowledgement weakens the effect. In addition, employee resentment will increase because of the perceived unfair distribution of recognition (Assembly, 2024).
Challenges
Creating objective and fair recognition poses considerable difficulties to organisations. Also, excessive use of the approach may lead to a loss of effectiveness in sustaining positive results (Assembly, 2024).
Cash and Non-Cash Awards
Money-based recognition rewards involve bonuses and monetary benefits, whereas non-money-based awards use gifts, vouchers, and event tickets. The organisation rewards outstanding employee achievements with money-based and non-tangible incentives (Cardrain, 2023).
Example (Eco-Insulate UK):
The absence of an incentive scheme at Eco-Insulate UK should be resolved through performance-based rewards and relevant gift vouchers to retain valued workers. Factory workers who deliver the most productive results can receive payment bonuses and shopping vouchers, protecting motivation and lowering turnover rates.
Importance, risks and challenges
Importance
Workers with different preferences will respond to combined monetary and non-monetary awards, boosting their motivation and retention rates. Besides, torque and duration of results match through cash-based incentives since fast rewards work together with long-term reward alternatives like gift cards and experiences (Inproma, 2019).
Risks
Nevertheless, schedule-based financial incentives can cause employees to lose their internal drive to succeed since they regularly rely on monetary compensation. Also, employees will feel dissatisfied when there is no transparency about distribution systems (Active, 2025).
Challenges
The management of expenses must achieve compatibility between price and generous payment benefits, which could be challenging. Besides, the process of personalisation should focus on finding awards which match the preferences of all team members (QIC, 2025). This is not easy.
AC 3.1 Assess the business context of the reward environment.
Company reward environments emerge from business factors inside and outside a company to direct organisational compensation system creation and deployment. Both company culture and financial performance represent internal business factors, and industrial trends and regional differences depict external business elements. This analysis examines the rewards environment by assessing essential internal and external business elements concerning Eco-Insulate UK.
Internal Factors
Organisational Culture (Scenario-Based Factor)
The Managing Director of Eco-Insulate UK recognised that an unfavourable company culture drives away personnel through excessive staff turnover. Companies with substandard organisational culture develop low team engagement that triggers productivity losses and makes talent recruitment and maintenance challenging (CIPD, 2024).
Impact on Reward Environment
The absence of motivation tools and insufficient appreciation create employee dissatisfaction, reducing operational effectiveness (Dewar, 2025). Staff at Eco-Insulate UK may feel undervalued because there are no existing reward scheme programs in place.
A well-designed reward system, including bonuses and recognition programs at Eco-Insulate UK, will increase employee satisfaction and maintain workforce stability, contributing to a better corporate culture (Dewar, 2025).
Financial Constraints
The firm’s current financial state determines how much support it can provide through compensation packages that match the competitive market (Wilson, 2023). The narrow profit margins at Eco-Insulate UK may make launching their reward scheme complex.
Impact on Reward Environment
A shortage of financial resources hinders the ability to raise employee salaries and provides performance-based bonus options, thus leading to retention challenges for skilled professionals (Wilson, 2023). Eco-Insulate UK would achieve positive results by using different types of non-financial rewards instead of hefty salary increases.
External Factors
Industrial Trends
The UK manufacturing sector suffers from talent deficits combined with rising worker competition in the market. Business organisations enhance employee compensation offers to acquire and maintain skilled team workers (Lauren, 2024).
Impact on Reward Environment
The failure of Eco-Insulate UK to maintain competitive compensation and benefits will result in employee attrition to employers who provide superior pay and benefits to their workforce (Lauren, 2024).
Embracing competitive rewards encompassing training programs and skill-based bonuses could attract more employees and customers to the company (Engage Employee, 2025).
Regional pay difference
There are differences in benefits and salaries across various regions following discrepancies in labour market conditions and living costs (CIPD, 2024). If Eco-Insulate’s operations are in a place with high costs of living but offer lower salaries, the employees could seek opportunities with better pay.
Impact on reward environment
To maintain competitiveness, the entity can adjust pay based on locations or non-monetary remunerations, including travel allowance (CIPD, 2024). Nevertheless, employees could leave the company and join competitors in locations with better pay programs. This raises turnover (CIPD, 2024).
AC 3.2 Evaluate the most appropriate ways in which benchmarking data can be gathered and measured to develop insight.
The assessment of reward structures through benchmarking is a vital organisational procedure that allows organisations measure their compensation systems against standard industry practices (Access People HR, 2024). The benchmarking data will enable Eco-Insulate UK to learn about competitive compensation standards, thus enhancing employee retention through better retention programs. Two established methods exist to obtain benchmarking data through which companies can evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.
Industry Salary and Reward Surveys
Compensation and working conditions data exist throughout various companies through industry salary and reward surveys. Surveys about salaries and rewards come from industry groups, HR consultancies, and government agencies (SteveC, 2023).
Advantages and disadvantages
The surveys reveal detailed information for specific industries, enabling Eco-Insulate UK to examine its pay policies against other companies operating in the eco-friendly manufacturing sector. The surveys also produce reliable, standardised data from respected organisational sources that maintain current market information (Whitfield, 2024).
Nevertheless, paying for high-quality surveys through subscription fees is problematic for Eco-Insulate UK due to financial limitations. This analysis combination proves both expensive and time-intensive (Whitfield, 2024). Also, the survey data presents difficulties because it provides general statistics that do not adapt to the specific requirements of Eco-Insulate UK.
Internal Payroll Data and Exit Interviews
The company can determine employee departure factors by evaluating Eco-Insulate UK’s payroll records and performing exit interviews. The financial records of employee salaries enable companies to track wage patterns, and exit interview responses show reward inadequacies (Henderson Loggie, 2023).
Advantages and disadvantages
Eco-Insulate UK benefits from specific analysis of its internal payroll because it enables targeted decisions regarding employee rewards. Exit interviews yield essential employee opinions to explain departures, which help identify poor aspects of the existing reward system (Henderson Loggie, 2013).
Nevertheless, the data available from internal payroll systems and exit interviews present no external benchmarks; hence, you struggle to measure your compensation practices against outside competitor data (Raymond, 2024). Staff departing from the company could give unverified complaints based on emotions since these subjective responses cannot show actual marketplace developments accurately (Raymond, 2024).
Conclusion and Recommendation
The trade-offs between industry survey data and internal employee salary data create different benefits and disadvantages. The market benchmarks offered by salary surveys come with high costs yet are generic, whereas internal payroll data delivers specific organisational insights yet cannot achieve external comparisons.
Eco-Insulate UK should implement a blended approach to its compensation strategy. The organisation will gain a comprehensive understanding through salary survey data from the industry’s internal payroll analysis and exit interview results. The combination will guide the company in establishing reward strategies that are competitive enough to reduce employee departures while raising team members’ happiness and retention.
AC 3.3 Explain approaches to job evaluation.
Approaches to Job Evaluation
Organisations use job evaluation as their systematic process to determine the worth of different positions. The system establishes fair compensation plans by evaluating different positions, their skill sets and responsibilities, and working,g environment requirements (). Both analytical and non-analytical systems represent different job evaluation methods. Two popular approaches exist to achieve job evaluation:
Point Factor Method (Analytical Approach)
Job assessment through the point factor method involves systematically rating work positions through a quantitative evaluation of skills and effort alongside responsibility and working conditions (Maini, 2023). All factors receive points or weights that are added to find the position of each job in the ranking system.
How It Works
A group of essential components for job compensation (such as problem-solving and physical effort) is initially established (AIHR, 2024). Every factor represents different levels that receive distinct point values according to their ranking. The points accumulated from a job help prove its worth to other positions in the organisation (AIHR, 2024).
Advantages and disadvantages
Using numerical data during evaluation produces a systematic approach that delivers objective results and transparent pay decisions (Plum, 2024). The method allows businesses to demonstrate salary rationale, protecting them from equal pay lawsuits.
Nevertheless, point factor system development and maintenance needs resources and expertise. This makes implementing smaller entities such as Eco-Insulate hard (Plum, 2024). In addition, the rigid structure might not easily accommodate fresh roles in job responsibility changes.
Job Ranking Method (Non-Analytical Approach)
Organisations can easily compare roles to determine their relative importance through a job ranking method but do not apply numerical weightings (HR List, 2024).
How It Works
Managers on a panel assess work functions and establish their worth relative ranking, beginning with the most valuable jobs. Job order determines pay rates because higher-ranking positions obtain better pay scales (HR List, 2024).
Advantages and disadvantages
The job ranking system is efficient because it avoids demanding job analysis work and complicated system scoring requirements (Wellhub Editorial Team, 2025). Besides, organisations achieve fast response time through the job-ranking framework that enables them to efficiently alter pay structures and settle salary imbalances.
Nevertheless, personal biases interfere with evaluation consistency due to the lack of evaluation criteria, which makes this measurement extremely subjective (Wellhub Editorial Team, 2025). In addition, the company cannot easily demonstrate justifiable pay differences because no established quantitative basis exists during equal pay disputes (Thompson, 2019).
Conclusion and Recommendation
The evaluation methods should be examined for their attributes alongside their negative points. Organisations working with intricate and defendable compensation structures should use the point factor approach, although it becomes impractical for Eco-Insulate UK because of its minor business nature. Organisations find implementing the job ranking method easier, yet this approach has imprecision and unfairness issues.
Eco-Insulate UK should use a job ranking methodology to establish simplicity before methodically implementing point factor elements to enhance accuracy and fairness in their compensation system. The proposed approach will produce an equitable reward system with a proper structure to solve turnover and cultural issues at the company.
AC 3.4 Explain the legislative requirements that impact reward practice.
The Existing Laws That Direct Reward Practice Implementation
The evaluation processes for rewards exist under strict court guidelines to maintain open and balanced workplace opportunities for all workers. Eco-Insulate UK’s management requires complete adherence to these laws because its high turnover and negative culture demand an equitable reward system that stays compliant with the law. Two primary laws govern reward approaches in organisations.
Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act 2010 unifies various existing labour discrimination laws at work. Under the equal pay provision of this law, men and women must earn equivalent payments when their work positions require identical skills. The regulations address discrimination that stems from gender, together with racial and disability requirements and other protected characteristics (ACAS, 2024).
How it Affects Reward Practice:
Equal pay for equal work
Eco-Insulate UK should guarantee that employees performing identical duties that demand equal experience receive the same payment regardless of their gender qualities or additional traits.
Job evaluation
Organisations need to implement fair, non-discriminatory job evaluation schemes to assess positions. The evaluation process at Eco-Insulate UK should prevent potential pay differences that arise from gender or protected characteristics discrimination.
Organisations face significant legal consequences of poor publicity and expensive compensation claims when they fail to follow the Equality Act requirements (ACAS, 2024). Eco-Insulate UK must establish clear pay structures with complete transparency and equal pay implementation because this will improve employee satisfaction while decreasing employee turnover.
National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (Minimum Pay)
According to the National Minimum Wage Act 1998, workers throughout the UK must receive at least the standard payment amount (Acas, 2024). All employees must follow this requirement with payment amounts based on their age status and apprentice standing.
How It Affects Reward Practice
Eco-Insulate UK must follow minimum wage standards by giving minimum wage to all worker groups, from skilled to unskilled positions (Acas, 2024). The enterprise becomes vulnerable to legal action alongside financial penalties when staff members receive pay rates below this threshold.
The act supports organisation-wide pay structure transparency, thus helping businesses establish authentic relationships with their workforce (LexisNexis, 2025). The implementation of reward structures which offer better pay than minimum wage at Eco-Insulate UK will support the recruitment and employee retention of skilled staff.
Non-compliance with the National Minimum Wage Act creates substantial legal and monetary repercussions, which destroy the company’s reputation while making it harder to attract and hold high-quality employees (LexisNexis, 2025).
Conclusion
Reward practices at organisations find their foundational form through legislation, including the Equality Act 2010 and the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. Eco-Insulate UK should use compliance with these laws to achieve legal requirements and develop a workplace that promotes fairness and transparency. Eco-Insulate UK will enhance employee retention and workplace satisfaction by building reward systems that follow legislative standards, thus addressing their present cultural and turnover difficulties.
References
ACAS (2024). Discrimination and the Law. [online] ACAS. Available at: https://www.acas.org.uk/discrimination-and-the-law [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Acas (2024). National Minimum Wage Entitlement | Acas. [online] Acas.org.uk. Available at: https://www.acas.org.uk/national-minimum-wage-entitlement [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Access People HR (2024). HR Benchmarking: a guide to getting started. [online] Peoplehr.com. Available at: https://www.peoplehr.com/en-gb/resources/blog/hr-benchmarking/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Active (2024). The Great Debate: Cash vs Non-Cash Incentives – Active Consultancy. [online] Active Consultancy. Available at: https://activeconsultancy.com/non-cash-vs-cash-incentive/ [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Active (2025). How Do Extrinsic Rewards Improve Employee Contribution? 6 Key Points – Active Consultancy. [online] Active Consultancy. Available at: https://activeconsultancy.com/how-extrinsic-rewards-improve-employee-contribution/ [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
AIHR (2024a). Extrinsic Rewards. [online] AIHR. Available at: https://www.aihr.com/hr-glossary/extrinsic-rewards/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
AIHR (2024b). Intrinsic Rewards. [online] AIHR. Available at: https://www.aihr.com/hr-glossary/intrinsic-rewards/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
AIHR (2024c). Point Factor Method. [online] AIHR. Available at: https://www.aihr.com/hr-glossary/point-factor-method/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Aithor (2024). Advantages and Disadvantages of Performance-Related Pay. [online] aithor.com. Available at: https://aithor.com/essay-examples/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-performance-related [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Anees, M. (2023). Intrinsic Motivation Advantages and Disadvantages for Organizations. [online] BRAVO! Employee Experience Management. Available at: https://getbravo.io/intrinsic-motivation-advantages-and-disadvantages/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Assembly (2024). Assembly | Your Digital HQ. [online] Joinassembly.com. Available at: https://www.joinassembly.com/faq/what-are-the-cons-of-employee-recognition [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Bonifacio, R. (2024). Performance related pay. [online] www.shiftbase.com. Available at: https://www.shiftbase.com/glossary/performance-related-pay [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Cardrain, D. (2023). Cash vs. Non-Cash Rewards. [online] Shrm.org. Available at: https://www.shrm.org/mena/topics-tools/news/hr-magazine/cash-vs-non-cash-rewards [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Caroline (2024). Treat them fair to keep them there? How to reward your employees fairly. [online] Zensai. Available at: https://zensai.com/articles/are-you-rewarding-your-employees-fairly-and-effectively/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
CIPD (2023). CIPD | Employee health and wellbeing. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/views-and-insights/cipd-viewpoint/employee-health-wellbeing/ [Accessed 7 Mar. 2025].
CIPD (2023). REWARD MANAGEMENT Focus on employee benefits. [online] Available at: https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/2018-pdfs/reward-management-report-2018_tcm18-51630.pdf [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
CIPD (2024a). CIPD | Organisational culture. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/views-and-insights/cipd-viewpoint/organisational-culture/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
CIPD (2024b). CIPD | Pay Structures and Pay Progression | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/pay-structures-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
CIPD (2024c). CIPD | Strategic & Total Reward | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/strategic-total-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Cotton, C. (2022). CIPD | Performance Related Pay | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/pay-performance-factsheet/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Dewar, K. (2025). Organizational Culture: Definition, Importance, and Development. [online] Achievers. Available at: https://www.achievers.com/blog/organizational-culture-definition/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Emma and Emma (2023). 3R Strategy. [online] 3R Strategy – The Pay & Reward Consultants & Partners. Available at: https://3r-strategy.com/narrow-vs-broad-career-bands-understanding-the-pros-and-cons/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Empuls (2025). What Are Extrinsic Rewards and Why Are They Important? [online] www.empuls.io. Available at: https://www.empuls.io/glossary/extrinsic-rewards [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Empuls (2025a). What are Intrinsic Rewards & Why are they Important? [online] www.empuls.io. Available at: https://www.empuls.io/glossary/intrinsic-rewards [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Empuls (2025b). What is Employee of the Month and Why is it Important? [online] www.empuls.io. Available at: https://www.empuls.io/glossary/employee-of-the-month-award [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Engage Employee (2025). Unlocking Success: The Impact of Benefits and Rewards in the Workplace. [online] Engageemployee.com. Available at: https://www.engageemployee.com/blog/unlocking-success-the-impact-of-benefits-and-rewards-in-the-workplace [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Henderson Loggie (2023). In-house payroll vs outsourced payroll: pros & cons. [online] Henderson Loggie. Available at: https://hlca.co.uk/resources/in-house-payroll-vs-outsourced-payroll-pros-cons/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
HR List (2024). Employee Ranking Systems: Pros, Cons & Alternatives. [online] allhrsoftware.com. Available at: https://allhrsoftware.com/blog/employee-ranking-systems-pros-cons-and-alternatives/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Ibitomi, T., Ojatuwase, O., Emmanuella, O. and Eke, T. (2022). Influence of Intrinsic Reward on Employees’ Performance in Deposit Money Banks in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, [online] 10(03), pp.528–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2022.103032.
Inproma (2019). Industry Insights | The Pros and Cons of Monetary vs. Non-Monetary Incentives for Employees. [online] Inproma. Available at: https://www.inproma.com/industry-insights/the-pros-and-cons-of-monetary-vs-non-monetary-incentives-for-employees/ [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Joseph, C. (2025). Pros & Cons of Competency Based Pay Plans. [online] smallbusiness.chron.com. Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/pros-cons-competency-based-pay-plans-2827.html [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Kinne, A. (2022). What Are the Benefits of Employee Recognition? | Workhuman. [online] www.workhuman.com. Available at: https://www.workhuman.com/blog/benefits-of-employee-recognition/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Kowalska, K. (2023). Extrinsic Motivation: Definition, Examples, Pros & Cons | Ogamify. [online] Available at: https://ogamify.com/employee-motivation/what-is-extrinsic-motivation/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Lauren (2024). Reward & Recognition in the Workplace | A Guide For HR Teams. [online] Incentivesmart. Available at: https://www.incentivesmart.com/blog/reward-recognition-workplace/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
LexisNexis (2025). National minimum wage Definition | Legal Glossary | LexisNexis. [online] @lexisnexis. Available at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/glossary/national-minimum-wage [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Maini, N. (2023). Job Evaluation Using Point Factor. [online] Synergogy. Available at: https://synergogy.com/job-evaluation-using-point-factor/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Manzoor, F., Wei, L. and Asif, M. (2021). Intrinsic Rewards and employee’s Performance with the Mediating Mechanism of employee’s Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, [online] 12(12). Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.563070/full [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Morris, A. (2025). Types of Pay Structure: Essential Guide | DavidsonMorris. [online] DavidsonMorris | Solicitors. Available at: https://www.davidsonmorris.com/pay-structure/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Novakovic, R. (2024). 9 Tips on How to Achieve Equity in Employee Rewards – Semos Cloud. [online] Semos Cloud. Available at: https://semoscloud.com/resources/blog/9-tips-on-how-to-achieve-equity-in-employee-rewards/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Plum (2024). Point Factor Method: Fair Job Evaluation Guide. [online] Plumhq.com. Available at: https://www.plumhq.com/hr-glossary/point-factor [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
QIC (2025). Cash vs. non-cash incentives and rewards – which motivates better? [online] Quality Incentive Company. Available at: https://qualityincentivecompany.com/recognition-incentive-resources/article-white-paper/cash-vs-rewards/ [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Rahul, K. (2024). Intrinsic Motivation. [online] Wallstreetmojo.com. Available at: https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/intrinsic-motivation/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Rataj, M. (2023). What is skill-based pay and why it matters. [online] Sloneek®. Available at: https://www.sloneek.com/blog/what-is-skill-based-pay/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Raymond, D. (2024). Top 10 Pros and Cons of Using Payroll Software. [online] AceProject. Available at: https://www.aceproject.com/blog/top-10-pros-cons-of-using-payroll-software-9387815/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Rice, A. (2021). Extrinsic Motivation: Examples, Pros, and Cons. [online] Psych Central. Available at: https://psychcentral.com/health/extrinsic-motivation [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Schooley, S. (2023). Offering Paid Leave Is Good for Your Business. [online] business.com. Available at: https://www.business.com/articles/paid-leave-is-good-for-business/ [Accessed 7 Mar. 2025].
Schurk, N. (2023). Understanding Salary Structures: Guide for HR Professionals. [online] www.goco.io. Available at: https://www.goco.io/blog/hr-guide-different-types-of-pay-structures [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
SCIO (2024). Pay and reward | Introducing a reward system. [online] Think Business, Think Equality. Available at: https://www.thinkbusinessthinkequality.org.uk/toolkit/7-pay-and-reward/32-introducing-a-reward-system/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Serrador, I. (2025). Skill based pay pros & cons (Compensation method explained). [online] Sesame HR. Available at: https://www.sesamehr.com/blog/benefits-compensation/skill-based-pay/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Shah, S. (2022). Cash vs. Non-Cash Incentives: All You Need to Know – Incentivate Blog. [online] Incentivatesolutions.com. Available at: https://incentivatesolutions.com/blogs/cash-vs-non-cash-incentives-all-you-need-to-know/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
SteveC (2023). Salary review pros and cons for today’s organisation. [online] Think Beyond. Available at: https://www.think-beyond.co.uk/salary-review-pros-and-cons-for-todays-organisation/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Suff, R. (2024). Wellbeing at work. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/well-being-factsheet/ [Accessed 7 Mar. 2025].
The Human Capital Hub (2023). Broadbanding And Why Your Organisation Should Try It. [online] Human Capital Hub. Available at: https://www.thehumancapitalhub.com/articles/Broadbanding-And-Why-Your-Organisation-Should-Try-It [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Thompson, J. (2019). Advantages & Disadvantages of Employee Ranking Tools. [online] Chron.com. Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-disadvantages-employee-ranking-tools-22523.html [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Tsang, S. (2020). Why You Need to Give Employees Public Recognition. [online] Fond. Available at: https://www.fond.co/blog/why-public-recognition/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Wellhub Editorial Team (2025). Job Evaluation: Methods, Benefits, and Best Practices. [online] wellhub.com. Available at: https://wellhub.com/en-us/blog/organizational-development/job-evaluation/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Whitfield, D. (2024). Salary Survey: Why You Need Them & Why They Are Not Enough. [online] www.hrdatahub.com. Available at: https://www.hrdatahub.com/blog/salary-survey-why-you-need-them-why-they-are-not-enough [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Wickham, N. (2023). The Importance of Employee Recognition: Statistics and Research. [online] Quantum Workplace. Available at: https://www.quantumworkplace.com/future-of-work/importance-of-employee-recognition [Accessed 25 Feb. 2025].
Wilson, M. (2023). The Impact of Monetary Rewards on Employee Motivation and Performance. [online] Bucketlist. Available at: https://bucketlistrewards.com/blog/impact-monetary-rewards-employees/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Bibliography
Dessler, G. (2020). Fundamentals of human resource management. thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn. Pearson.
Lehmann, O.F. (2018). Project Business Management. Auerbach Publications eBooks. doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315277387.
Steward, G., L and Brown, K.G. (2019). Human Resource Management. [online] Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=53eYDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA2&dq=Human+resources+book&ots=XGvMmbsb1j&sig=X68LNFIqtJ67Ur8I18bFdJ6qnjI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Human%20resources%20book&f=false [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].
Must Read:
